Posted: December 15, 2015 in Thoughts
Tags: , , , ,

Insanity is a strange concept to try and think rationally about. How do you come to understand something that by definition is unrational. How rational are we to start with? Do we really know our own thoughts or are we just a child king? our concioeness just riding on top of decisions that are out of our hands and then just justifying them after the fact.

Is insanity really doing the same thing over and over and hopeing for a different result. Because at a quantum level is there ever the same thing or not a different result?

How does one delusional person that belives plainly false ideals get held up as a challenge to the staus quo making the system think, when another that has a legitimate concern with a faulty system is called a danger, rabble rouser or even terrorist? Even when the first puts lives at risk and the second doesn’t?

Why is it that insanity is deemed brilliance in some and a desease in others? That some obsessions are considered virtues and others vices. That apathy is seen as better than empathy.  Why is the cinic considered the voice of the wise but optimism the symptom of a dull mind or at best a naive one.

So yeah thats something. Go chew on those tasty thought biscuits and see what falls out.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s